Expert Insights

Expert Insights are a chance for professionals working in the suicide prevention sector to gain access to the leaders of their field. LIFE collects your questions around a particular topic and passes them on to an elected expert for consideration. The expert responses are then published here on the LIFE site. If you would like to suggest a topic or an expert for a future edition of Expert Insights, please contact us

Expert Insights 7: International perspectives

Cultural factors are a key consideration when working to prevent suicide. Suicide rates and trends have been found to differ significantly across countries and cultural groups, and much can be learned from the examination and comparison of these factors in countries outside our own. This special international edition of Expert Insights features a unique opportunity for suicide prevention professionals working in Australia to ask an international industry expert about the effects of cultural factors on suicidality

Expert: Professor Paul Yip

Professor Paul Yip
Professor Yip is the Director of the Centre Suicide Research and Prevention and a professor of the Department of Social Work and Social Administration at The University of Hong Kong. He is also vice president of the International Association of Suicide Prevention (IASP). He won the Stengel Research award for his contribution for suicide prevention in 2011. His recent monograph "Suicide in Asia: causes and prevention" has provided an important contribution in understanding suicide and its prevention in Asia. He has also done innovative suicide prevention work in means restriction in a community-based exploratory study.

His current interests are in adopting a public health approach in suicide prevention, especially through restriction of means, cost-effectiveness of suicide prevention, mass media contagious effect on suicide, east and west comparison in suicide gender ratio, cultural and religious effect on suicide and program evaluation of evidence-based suicide prevention programs. 

Question 1

What are the main cultural factors (in your experience) affecting suicide in Asia?

Stigma is one of the important features. Depression and mental health is not well understood in Asia, due to stigma and the insufficient resources allocated for the purpose of helping those with mental health problems. 

But stigma and resources allocation are also related. Stigma and prejudice against mental illness affects the funding and also the ability to raise funds from the community.

more...
Top

Question 2

Dear Professor Yip, 

Thank you for making yourself available to answer my question. I work for the State Coroner in Western Australia and I have previously worked for an agency that provided support to people affected by suicide. The rate of men taking their lives in Australia is about 4 to 1 compared to females. Is this disparity in the genders similar in Hong Kong and other countries? 

Kind regards 
Philip Riseborough 
Coronial Counsellor, Coroner’s Court of WA

No, in Asia, the gender ratio is much lower; it is about 1 to 2 men to 1 woman. However, the overall rate is similar - suicide rates are 13.5 and 11.0 for Hong Kong and Australia, respectively. What it translates to is that we have a relatively lower rate among men compared to Australia, whereas a higher rate of women was found in Hong Kong or Asia.

The reasons for the higher rate among women are complicated and multifactorial. We have seen a higher rate among older adult women in Asia. Most of the older adults have a higher proportion of suffering from more than one disease, sometimes not terminal but painful. The insufficiency of medical and health service could be one of the causes, and the mismatch of expectation between older generation and younger generation.

Also, the method used among the women in Asia is very different from the west. They tend to use more lethal methods, including pesticides.

more...
Top

Question 3

The Australian media recently reported on the rate of suicide in South Korea – one of the highest in the developed world. Do you have any insights into any factors involved in the high numbers of suicide deaths in South Korea, particularly those that might be unique to that country? 

The suicide rate in South Korea in 2010 was 31.2 per 100,000 people, the highest amongst OECD countries and amongst the highest in the world. However, it was only 10 per 100,000 in 1990. The increase over the last two decades was substantial. 

The causes of the surge in suicide in South Korea may be complex. Some research indicated that the Asian economic crisis in 1997 and rise in unemployment rates might account for some of the increases in suicide in South Korea; however suicide rates continued to rise after its economy recovered few years later. 

The rise in suicide was most prominent in the elderly; this may be related to the disintegration of support networks in rural areas when young people moved to the cities. 

South Koreans living in rural areas have easy access to highly toxic pesticides, and pesticide poisoning accounted for over 20% of total suicides in South Korea, compared to less than 1% in Australia.

Recent studies also indicated the impact of extensive media coverage of celebrity suicide on trends in suicide in South Korea; increases in suicide rates following celebrity suicides could last for one to two months. 

The aforementioned factors, including economic recession, rise in unemployment, easy access to highly toxic pesticides, and the media, were also found to influence suicide rates in other Asian countries such as Taiwan, demonstrating that findings from one country may have implications for suicide prevention in other countries. The South Korean government has taken some actions aimed to prevent suicide, e.g. to establish the Korea Suicide Prevention Center and ban the sales of paraquat, one of the most lethal pesticides which accounted for more than 1000 suicides per year in South Korea.   

more...
Top

Question 4

How can culturally diverse workplaces implement practices to reduce suicide risk factors that are effective, and most importantly sensitive to all cultures. What is the best approach to take when developing such policies and initiatives? 
Courtney Collier, SuperFriend

There are more working people than unemployed people who die from suicide. According to the Rose Theorem (‘a large number of people at small risk may give rise to more cases of disease than a small number who are at high risk’), it may be more effective to target the working population (a large number at a lower risk) than the unemployed (a small number at a higher risk). 

It is important to cultivate a “mental wellbeing-friendly” working environment. In this aspect, Australia has been doing much better than other countries.  Long working hours and lower wages in Hong Kong and other Asian countries have proved to be conducive to generating a high GDP growth with a higher profit margin for businesses. However, it is the mental wellbeing of the employee that is paying a high cost, which has not been factored into our cost-benefit analysis.

The important thing is to make sure the employee can benefit from the economic growth and additional business activities. Engaging the employee in a meaningful way and rewarding them in a tangible manner are very important not only for maintaining good employer and employee relationships, but also for the employees’ wellbeing as well.

Australia is known to be culturally sensitive. Embracing diversity and accommodating difference in the work place is certainly the way to go to make workplaces more conducive to enhancing wellbeing.

more...
Top

Question 5

As a largely multicultural nation, how best can health professionals working to prevent suicide in Australia address the specific needs of people from culturally diverse backgrounds who are at risk of suicide? 

Removing the stigma among health professionals that may arise from ignorance, lack of knowledge, prejudice and bias, and even discriminatory attitudes against certain groups.

For example, self-harm patients, especially the young and multiple attempters, being admitted to the emergency department – sometimes the health care professionals don’t pay sufficient attention and support to them. There could also be barriers for the non-English speaking patients to receive the appropriate care and support.

Raising awareness and knowledge of cultural diversity among health professionals is indeed very important, as they are always the first engagement to seeking help. If the experiences were not pleasant, it will discourage them from seeking help.  Understanding different cultures with empathy and sensitive attitudes would certainly help.

more...
Top

Leave a comment


  • Who is the Prime Minister of this country?New question

Comment bubbleUser comments

25-Mar-13 03:52 PM
Comment posted by: Kara
Hi Professor Yip, I would like to know what is being done to restrict access to means in Asia (Hong Kong) and is this showing positive results? I am also interested to know if there are high school prevention programs conducted and the success of these if tested? Sincerely Kara Ekeberg
25-Mar-13 04:09 PM
Comment posted by: LIFE Communications
Hi Kara, Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately our 'call for questions' period for Professor Yip is finished. If you'd like to participate in upcoming editions of Expert Insights by submitting your questions, make sure you're on our LIFE News subscriber list (there is a 'subscribe' box on the left hand side of this page) so you can receive our next invitation to contribute. Thanks, LIFE Communications
26-Mar-13 12:56 PM
Comment posted by: hammosan
This article was concise and rather confronting. I did not know that Asian women had such high suicide rates and that they used pesticide. the link between acssebility and abuse of products is so starkly evidenced in the Korean example. Thanks for explaining about the importance of culture on attitudes and behaviours. I think it is the same for micro cultures, i.e. the disadvantaged within our Australian culture.